Naproxen |
Aleve; Anaprox; Anaprox DS; EC-Naprosyn; Naprelan; Naprosyn |
Clinical Trial: Oral Vs Rectal Admin of Naproxen for Post-Vag Perineal Pain Control
This study is not yet open for patient recruitment.
Verified by University of Saskatchewan September 2005
|
Purpose
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| post-vaginal delivery perineal pain | Drug: Naproxen | Phase IV |
MedlinePlus consumer health information
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: Oral Vs Rectal Administration of Naproxen for Post-Vaginal Perineal Pain Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Secondary Outcomes: 1. patient preference of route of administration; 2. medication adverse effects; 3. additional requests for analgesia.
Expected Total Enrollment: 60
Study start: January 2006
Postpartum perineal pain is common after vaginal delivery. Naproxen suppositories have been shown to be effective at reducing postpartum perineal pain. To date, no studies have investigated the efficacy of oral naproxen for perineal pain control. Currently, rectal naproxen is used postpartum because of an assumption that there is a “local effect” compared to oral administration. However, this effect has never been documented in the literature.
Principles of pharmacology dictate that the least invasive route of drug administration should be used when two or more routes are equally effective. If oral and rectal naproxen are equally efficacious at controlling post-vaginal delivery perineal pain, then current practice would be challenged.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the route of administration of naproxen influences post-vaginal delivery perineal pain control. Pain scores will be measured using a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome measures are three-fold: patient preference of route of administration, medication adverse effects, and additional requests for analgesia. The working hypothesis is that there is no difference in pain control between oral and rectal administration and that patients will prefer the oral route.
Eligibility
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Potential volunteers who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
- Active labor, whether spontaneous or induced
- Age between 18 and 40 years old
- Nulliparous
- BMI < 40
- Single live intrauterine fetus in cephalic presentation
- Term gestation (370 weeks to 416 weeks inclusive) as defined by ultrasound or last menstrual period dating
- Intrapartum epidural labour analgesia
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Potential volunteers meeting one of more of the following criteria may not be enrolled:
-
Medical conditions including:
- Naproxen, aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity
- Asthma
- Peptic ulcer disease or other inflammatory gastrointestinal disease
- Renal, hepatic or cardiac disease
- Coagulopathy
- Rectal or anal pathology including recent (within 1 month) rectal bleeding
- Prescribed medications including lithium, furosemide, antihypertensives, anticoagulants, amnioglycosides, hydantoins, or sulfonamides
-
Obstetrical conditions including:
- Nulliparous women not requiring intrapartum epidural labour analgesia
-
Location and Contact Information
Canada, Saskatchewan
Department of Anesthesia, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8, Canada
David C Campbell, MD,MSc,FRCPC, Principal Investigator
David C Campbell, MD,MSC,FRCPC, Principal Investigator, University of Saskatchewan
More Information
Last Updated: September 21, 2005
Record first received: September 19, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00222976
Health Authority: Canada: Health Canada
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2005-09-27

Not Signed In -

