Prostatitis: Disorders of the Prostate |
Prostate Enlargement: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Prostate gland enlargement; What Is Prostatitis? |
Clinical Trial: NCI HIGH PRIORITY CLINICAL TRIAL --- Prostatectomy Compared With Watchful Waiting in Treating Patients With Stage I or Stage II Prostate Cancer
This study is no longer recruiting patients.
Purpose
RATIONALE: Watchful waiting until symptoms appear may be effective in patients with prostate cancer. It is not yet known if watchful waiting is more effective than prostatectomy for early prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomizedphase III trial to compare surgery with watchful waiting in men who have stage I or stage II prostate cancer.
| Condition | Treatment or Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| adenocarcinoma of the prostate stage I prostate cancer stage II prostate cancer | Procedure: chemotherapy Procedure: conventional surgery Procedure: endocrine therapy Procedure: hormone therapy Procedure: radiation therapy Procedure: surgery | Phase III |
MedlinePlus related topics: Prostate Cancer
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment
Official Title: NCI HIGH PRIORITY CLINICAL TRIAL --- Phase III Randomized Study of Prostatectomy Versus Expectant Management With Palliative Therapy in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer (PIVOT)
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the overall mortality rate in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and early intervention for subsequent disease progression vs expectant management with therapy reserved for palliation of symptomatic or metastatic disease.
- Compare the prostate cancer-specific survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the effects of radical prostatectomy on disease recurrence in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Within 6 weeks after randomization, patients undergo pelvic lymph node dissection (at the discretion of the urologist) followed within 2 weeks by radical prostatectomy. The choice of surgical procedure (retropubic, perineal, nerve sparing, or nonnerve sparing) is at the discretion of the urologist. Patients with metastases may undergo standard therapy, including prostatectomy, observation, orchiectomy or hormonal therapy, or radiotherapy. Patients with disease progression may undergo standard therapy, including hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, mechanical intervention, or observation.
- Arm II: Patients undergo expectant management with interventions reserved for symptomatic or metastatic disease. Asymptomatic disease progression (e.g., enlarging mass on digital rectal exam or imaging study, increase in PSA) without evidence of metastatic disease is not considered an indication for intervention. Patients with symptomatic local progression are treated first with alpha blockers or mechanical intervention (e.g., transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), transurethral incision of the prostate, stent placement). Patients with symptomatic regional progression undergo mechanical intervention, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy, as indicated. Hormonal therapy is considered first-line therapy for patients with disease progression requiring nonmechanical therapy. Patients with disease that continues to progress or fails to respond to hormonal therapy undergo radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients with symptomatic local disease progression (defined as recurrent and persistent gross hematuria or bladder outlet obstruction) despite TURP, stents, and alpha blockers may undergo prostatectomy. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 6 months.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 15 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,050 patients will be accrued for this study within 7 years.
Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study: up to 75 Years, Genders Eligible for Study: Both
Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Adenocarcinoma of the prostate diagnosed within the past year
- Clinically localized disease (T1a-c or T2a-c, NX, M0)
- PSA no greater than 50 ng/mL
- No evidence of metastatic disease on bone scan
- No evidence of nonlocalized disease on other imaging studies
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age:
- 75 and under
Performance status:
- Not specified
Life expectancy:
- At least 10 years
Hematopoietic:
- Not specified
Hepatic:
- No severe hepatic impairment
Renal:
- Creatinine no greater than 3.0 mg/dL
- No severe renal impairment
Cardiovascular:
- No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
- No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- No unstable angina
- No other severe cardiac impairment
Pulmonary:
- No severe pulmonary impairment
Other:
- No other significant concurrent medical condition that is acute or debilitating or would increase risk
- No dementia
- No nondermatologic malignancy within the past 5 years
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy:
- Not specified
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy for prostate cancer
Endocrine therapy:
- No prior hormonal therapy for prostate cancer
- No concurrent estrogens or antiandrogens
Radiotherapy:
- No prior radiotherapy for prostate cancer
Surgery:
Other:
- No concurrent participation in another intervention research study
Location Information
Iowa
Iowa Lutheran Hospital, Des Moines, Iowa, 50316-2301, United States
John Stoddard Cancer Center at Iowa Methodist Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa, 50309, United States
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center-Des Moines, Des Moines, Iowa, 50314, United States
Nebraska
Midlands Cancer Center at Midlands Community Hospital, Papillion, Nebraska, 68128-4157, United States
New Mexico
MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Pennsylvania
Penn State Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850, United States
Wisconsin
CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54307-3453, United States
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-3236, United States
Australia, New South Wales
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Peru
Instituto de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 34, Peru
Puerto Rico
San Juan City Hospital, San Juan, 00936-7344, Puerto Rico
Timothy James Wilt, MD, MPH, Study Chair, Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Minneapolis
Timothy James Wilt, MD, MPH, Study Chair, Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Minneapolis
Daniel J. Culkin, MD, FACS, Study Chair, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Timothy David Moon, MD, Study Chair, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center
More Information
Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database
Publications
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy versus expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1994 Nov;152(5 Pt 2):1910-4.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK. Early intervention or expectant management for prostate cancer. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT): a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol. 1995 May;13(2):130-6. No abstract available.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK: The prostate cancer intervention versus observation trial (PIVOT): a randomized trial comparing radical prostectomy versus expectant management for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Cancer 75(7 Suppl): 1963-1968, 1995.
[No authors listed] Screening for prostate cancer. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Mar 15;126(6):480-4. Review. No abstract available.
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK. The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). Oncology (Huntingt). 1997 Aug;11(8):1133-9; discussion 1139-40, 1143. Review.
Moon TD, Brawer MK, Wilt TJ. Prostate Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT): a randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with palliative expectant management for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. PIVOT Planning Committee. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;(19):69-71. No abstract available.
Wilt TJ: Expectant management or early intervention of clinically localized prostate cancer? What we need are randomized trials. Clinical Care for Prostatic Diseases 1 : 1-9, 1994.
Record last reviewed: September 2004
Last Updated: October 13, 2004
Record first received: November 1, 1999
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002606
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2005-04-08
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Cache Date: April 9, 2005
Resources
- Prostatitis: Disorders of the Prostate (National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases)

Not Signed In -

